CiteWeb id: 19860000036

CiteWeb score: 6737

DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2

This chapter outlines the two basic routes to persuasion. One route is based on the thoughtful consideration of arguments central to the issue, whereas the other is based on the affective associations or simple inferences tied to peripheral cues in the persuasion context. This chapter discusses a wide variety of variables that proved instrumental in affecting the elaboration likelihood, and thus the route to persuasion. One of the basic postulates of the Elaboration Likelihood Model—that variables may affect persuasion by increasing or decreasing scrutiny of message arguments—has been highly useful in accounting for the effects of a seemingly diverse list of variables. The reviewers of the attitude change literature have been disappointed with the many conflicting effects observed, even for ostensibly simple variables. The Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) attempts to place these many conflicting results and theories under one conceptual umbrella by specifying the major processes underlying persuasion and indicating the way many of the traditionally studied variables and theories relate to these basic processes. The ELM may prove useful in providing a guiding set of postulates from which to interpret previous work and in suggesting new hypotheses to be explored in future research.

The publication "The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion" is placed in the Top 10000 of the best publications in CiteWeb. Also in the category Sociology it is included to the Top 100. Additionally, the publicaiton "The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion" is placed in the Top 100 among other scientific works published in 1986.
Links to full text of the publication: