Autors:

CiteWeb id: 20090000001

CiteWeb score: 33541

This article examines the adequacy of the “rules of thumb” conventional cutoff criteria and several new alternatives for various fit indexes used to evaluate model fit in practice. Using a 2‐index presentation strategy, which includes using the maximum likelihood (ML)‐based standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) and supplementing it with either Tucker‐Lewis Index (TLI), Bollen's (1989) Fit Index (BL89), Relative Noncentrality Index (RNI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Gamma Hat, McDonald's Centrality Index (Mc), or root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA), various combinations of cutoff values from selected ranges of cutoff criteria for the ML‐based SRMR and a given supplemental fit index were used to calculate rejection rates for various types of true‐population and misspecified models; that is, models with misspecified factor covariance(s) and models with misspecified factor loading(s). The results suggest that, for the ML method, a cutoff value close to .95 for TLI, BL89, CFI, RNI, and G...

The publication "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives" is placed in the Top 100 of the best publications in CiteWeb. Also in the category Mathematics it is included to the Top 100. Additionally, the publicaiton "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives" is placed in the Top 100 among other scientific works published in 2009.
Links to full text of the publication: