# Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit

**Robert Cudeck**

CiteWeb id: 19920000002

CiteWeb score: 22099

DOI: 10.1177/0049124192021002005

This article is concerned with measures of fit of a model. Two types of error involved in fitting a model are considered. The first is error of approximation which involves the fit of the model, with optimally chosen but unknown parameter values, to the population covariance matrix. The second is overall error which involves the fit of the model, with parameter values estimated from the sample, to the population covariance matrix. Measures of the two types of error are proposed and point and interval estimates of the measures are suggested. These measures take the number of parameters in the model into account in order to avoid penalizing parsimonious models. Practical difficulties associated with the usual tests of exact fit or a model are discussed and a test of â€œclose fitâ€ of a model is suggested.

**Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit**" is placed in the Top 1000 of the best publications in CiteWeb. Also in the category Mathematics it is included to the Top 100. Additionally, the publicaiton "

**Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit**" is placed in the Top 100 among other scientific works published in 1992.

- smr.sagepub.com/content/21/2/230.abstract
- https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v21y1992i2p230-258.html
- https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/sage/alternative-ways-of-assessing-model-fit-E5QqJW0KL0
- EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:21:y:1992:i:2:p:230-258
- en.journals.sid.ir/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=306593
- www.deepdyve.com/lp/sage/alternative-ways-of-assessing-model-fit-E5QqJW0KL0

Robert Cudeck,

Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit(1992)## HTML code:

## Wiki code: