Autors:

CiteWeb id: 19790000001

CiteWeb score: 42166

DOI: 10.2307/1914185

This paper presents a critique of expected utility theory as a descriptive model of decision making under risk, and develops an alternative model, called prospect theory. Choices among risky prospects exhibit several pervasive effects that are inconsistent with the basic tenets of utility theory. In particular, people underweight outcomes that are merely probable in comparison with outcomes that are obtained with certainty. This tendency, called the certainty effect, contributes to risk aversion in choices involving sure gains and to risk seeking in choices involving sure losses. In addition, people generally discard components that are shared by all prospects under consideration. This tendency, called the isolation effect, leads to inconsistent preferences when the same choice is presented in different forms. An alternative theory of choice is developed, in which value is assigned to gains and losses rather than to final assets and in which probabilities are replaced by decision weights. The value function is normally concave for gains, commonly convex for losses, and is generally steeper for losses than for gains. Decision weights are generally lower than the corresponding probabilities, except in the range of low probabilities. Overweighting of low probabilities may contribute to the attractiveness of both insurance and gambling.

The publication "PROSPECT THEORY: AN ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK" is placed in the Top 100 of the best publications in CiteWeb. Also in the category Economics it is included to the Top 100. Additionally, the publicaiton "PROSPECT THEORY: AN ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK" is placed in the Top 100 among other scientific works published in 1979.
Links to full text of the publication: